Effects Go Beyond Better Health,
Experts Say
By David Brown, Washington Post Staff Writer,
Monday, November 22, 2004; Page A12
It is safe to say that a world without safe, abundant and easily
accessible water is hard for most Americans to imagine -- and one they
would find hard to tolerate. The same goes for life without private,
relatively clean places in which to go to the toilet.
Around the world, however, 1.1 billion people get their
water from rivers and ponds, or from springs and wells open
to the air and subject to contamination. More than twice as many --
2.5 billion people in all -- use public latrines or the whole outdoors
as their bathroom.
Access to safe water and basic sanitation were among the "Millennium
Development Goals" that 189 heads of state from around the world adopted
in 2000. Specifically, they pledged that by 2015 they would reduce by at
least half the proportion of people living without those two essential
comforts of civilization. The year 1990 was taken as the baseline
against which progress would be measured.
Reaching those goals would have profound effects on the world's
poorest people -- effects far beyond better health, the most obvious
one. The World Health Organization and UNICEF recently issued a report
on the progress achieved as of 2002, the midpoint in that 25-year
period.
In 1990, 77 percent of the globe's population had access to indoor
running water, piped public taps, protected wells and rainwater. In
2002, 83 percent of people had those "improved" drinking water sources.
Progress is on track to meet the target of 89 percent by 2015.
Equally impressive is the fact that 52 percent of people have the
best of the "improvements": household running water.
"More than half the population of the planet uses piped water at
home. That is a stunning achievement," said Jamie Bertram, coordinator
of WHO's water, sanitation and health program.
The sanitation news is less encouraging.
"Improved" forms of sanitation include not only flush toilets, but
also latrines that are used by only one household, and are ventilated
and designed to isolate waste from the surrounding environment. In 1990,
49 percent of people used such facilities. By 2002, that had increased
to just 58 percent.
Unless progress accelerates, the target of 75 percent coverage
will not be met, with the effort falling short by about half a billion
people.
"The gap between the haves and the have-nots is widening," said
Vanessa Tobin, UNICEF's chief of sanitation. "We need to have local
solutions that are sustainable and affordable."
China and India together have the most people without safe water
or improved sanitation. In the case of sanitation, 1.5 billion people in
those two countries do without. Among regions, though, Africa is worst
off. The entire sub-Saharan part of that continent today is only
somewhat ahead of the United States of 1900.
In that year, 42 percent of Americans had access to public water
and 29 percent to sewage systems. Among Africans in 2002, 58 percent had
access to improved water (only 16 percent with household connections),
and 36 percent had improved sanitation.
Although clean water and toilets have many benefits, some are not
entirely obvious. Both improvements lead to better health, although how
much each contributes has been hard to measure. That is because people's
health is also affected by personal habits, methods of storing and
cooking food, as well as by education and income.
Piped water reduces the incidence of typhoid fever -- an outcome
seen both in contemporary studies and in historical analysis. In
Philadelphia, for example, a study showed that as water filtration was
brought to the city's six water districts between 1902 and 1909, typhoid
mortality in each district fell. Between 1888 and 1912, deaths in German
cities from that disease fell by 80 percent, with half of the decrease
attributed to piped water.
But clean water by itself has relatively little effect on rates of
other water-borne infections, such as childhood diarrhea. Those
illnesses are mostly transmitted by the fecal contamination of food,
dishes and hands. They reflect the amount of water a household
has for washing and hygiene, not the quality of the water.
For that reason, bringing the source of water to the house or yard
reduces the diarrhea rate by 44 percent, while water delivered to a
public "standpipe" -- where someone must go with a water container --
reduces the rate only by 6 percent.
Improved sanitation cuts diarrhea incidence by a quarter to a
third. Interventions that promote personal hygiene, such as hand
washing, decrease it by 42 percent, according to a recent analysis of
studies by Lorna Fewtrell of the University of Wales and Jack M. Colford
of the University of California at Berkeley.
Traditional water-borne diseases, however, are not the only ones
reduced by clean water and toilets.
Trachoma is a bacterial infection of the eyelid responsible for
about 6 million cases of blindness worldwide. Better water and
sanitation reduces trachoma rates by an average of 27 percent.
Once-a-day face washing with a handful of water is one of the four chief
interventions being pushed in an international effort to eliminate
trachoma.
Curiously, health benefits are far down the list of reasons that
people in poor countries give for wanting better water and sanitation
services. Relief from the drudgery of carrying water long distances -- a
chore borne almost entirely by women and girls -- is the chief benefit
that people mention.
A 2002 UNICEF study of rural households in 23 sub-Saharan
countries found that a quarter of them spent 30 minutes to an hour each
day collecting and carrying water, and 19 percent spent an hour or more.
With closer water comes greater self-esteem, less harassment of women,
and better school attendance by girls -- three things spontaneously
mentioned by people in Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania and India in a
different study.
Toilets are similarly liberating. In many cultures, rural women
venture out to urinate and defecate only at night.
In a study of 320 households in the West African nation of Benin,
people were asked to rank the benefits of owning a latrine on a scale of
1 to 4. "Avoid discomforts of the bush" came in at 3.98. "Gain prestige
from visitors" was 3.96. "Avoid snakes" was 3.85.
"Health" was 1.27.
Back
STATISTICS ON HIV/AIDS IN AFRICA
The numbers on actual AIDS funding are imprecise, it appears that
African countries are today spending $300 to $400 million a year for
AIDS. This is less than 10 percent of what is required. In 1996-97, a
total of $165 million was spent on AIDS programs in Africa. Of this,
$150 million came from external sources (donor agencies, multilateral
banks, and United Nations organizations), and $15 million was from
African governments. Estimates suggest that external funding for AIDS in
Africa may have risen to around $210 million in 1998. Further increases
pushed total expenditures on AIDS to $300-400 million a year in 2000,
and recent new financial commitments suggest that actual disbursements
will also rise in the coming years. But a much larger "quantum leap" in
funding will be needed to close the gap, which was allowed to widen in
the 1990s. -- Draft Paper for the Abuja Summit on HIV/AIDS,
April 16, 2001, written by staff of the UNAIDS Secretariat in Geneva,
with helpful inputs from the Economic Commission for Africa
Although HIV was first detected in the South Africa largely among men
who have sex with men and transfusion recipients between 1982 and 1987,
the virus has moved into the heterosexual population, with the country
experiencing an "explosive spread" of HIV between 1994 and 1998. Fifty
percent of pregnant women in some parts of the country are HIV-positive.
Vertical HIV transmission in the Western Cape has been reduced by 50
percent since 1999. -- Abdool Karim, Xinhua News Agency
report, August 4, 2003
University of Natal researcher Quarraisha Abdool Karim said that
national mortality rates for South African men between the ages of 20
and 40 increased by more than 150 percent since 1998, and the mortality
rate for women between the ages of 20 and 35 has risen even more. Abdool
Karim said that although the increasing death rates could "stabilize"
the country's overall AIDS prevalence rate, it would be "premature and
foolish" to believe that AIDS was "under control" in South Africa. --
Xinhua News Agency, August 4, 2003
75 percent of all people with HIV in the world live in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Currently 25 million Africans are infected with HIV. --
“Country Data - 1997, 1999 & 2001,” By Maphindi Sibiya
South African officials expect 50,000 people to be on antiretroviral
drugs by the end of the year and 1.4 million people to be on the drugs
by 2009, at a total cost of $700 million. -- BBC News, April 1,
2004
According to a survey conducted by the Washington Post:
- 67 percent of respondents believe that HIV/AIDS in South Africa is
a "crisis," 27 percent believe the disease poses a "serious problem
but not a crisis," 4 percent believe the disease is a problem "but not
a serious one" and 1 percent do not see HIV/AIDS as a problem in the
country.
- 79 percent of all respondents were very worried about contracting
HIV, compared with 86 percent of blacks, 72 percent of participants of
mixed race, 66 percent of Indian respondents and 43 percent of whites.
- 28 percent of all respondents have known a close friend or
relative who has died of AIDS-related complications, compared with 31
percent of blacks, 20 percent of respondents of mixed race, 8 percent
of Indian participants and 17 percent of whites. -- Majority
of South Africans Say Government Has Not Done Enough To Fight
HIV/AIDS, Survey Shows, April 1, 2004, according to a survey conducted
by the Washington Post, the Kaiser Family Foundation and
Harvard University
Currently, there are about five million people living with HIV in
South Africa, the most of any country in the world, the Washington Post
reports. In addition, the epidemic is expected to reduce the life
expectancy in the country from 68 years to 36 years by 2010. --
Majority of South Africans Say Government Has Not Done Enough To Fight
HIV/AIDS, Survey Shows, April 1, 2004, according to a survey conducted
by the Washington Post, the Kaiser Family Foundation and
Harvard University
Botswana had the worst AIDS rate in the world; 38.8 percent of the
adult population had contracted AIDS (2001). -- UNAIDS/WHO
Epidemiological Fact Sheet on Botswana: 2002 Update; CIA World Factbook
2002.
Botswana’s healthy life expectancy at birth is 36.0 for males and
35.4 for females. -- The World Health Report 2003
An estimated 5 million South Africans, including 2.7 million women,
were living with AIDS, according to a UNAIDS/WHO Epidemiological Fact
Sheet on South Africa: 2002 Update; CIA World Factbook 2002. It was
estimated that 660,000 South African children under the age of 15 had
lost their mother or father or both parents to AIDS (2001). There were
11 million episodes of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) reported in
1999. -- UNAIDS/WHO Epidemiological Fact Sheet on South Africa:
2002 Update; CIA World Fact book 2002
Uganda is considered the success story in Africa, regarding AIDS
containment. Yet, there were an estimated 510,000 people living with
HIV/AIDS, along with an estimated 84,000 deaths due to AIDS. Some
880,000 children 15 or younger had lost their mother or father or both
parents to AIDS. -- UNAIDS/WHO Epidemiological Fact Sheet on
Uganda: 2002 Update; CIA World Factbook 2002.
Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 29.4 million people living with
HIV/AIDS. Approximately 3.5 million new infections occurred there in
2002, while the epidemic claimed the lives of an estimated 2.4 million
Africans in the past year. Ten million young people (aged 15-24) and
almost 3 million children under 15 are living with HIV. --
“Country Data - 1997, 1999 & 2001,” By Maphindi Sibiya
Rampant epidemics are under way in southern Africa, where in four
countries, national adult HIV prevalence has risen higher than 30
percent: Botswana (38.8 percent), Zimbabwe (33.7 percent), Swaziland
(33.4 percent), and Lesotho (31 percent). -- “Country Data -
1997, 1999 & 2001,” By Maphindi Sibiya
Uganda continues to provide evidence that the epidemic does yield to
human intervention. HIV infection levels appear to be on the decline
recently in several parts of the country — as shown by the steady drop
in HIV prevalence among 15- to 19-year-old pregnant women. Trends in
behavioral indicators are in line with this apparent decline in HIV
incidence. -- “Country Data - 1997, 1999 & 2001,” By Maphindi
Sibiya
Infection rates in Uganda have declined from 21 percent to 6 percent
since 1991. -- Edward C. Green, Senior Research Scientist,
Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies
Malawi had 470,000 children orphaned by AIDS at the end of 2001. –
AIDS Orphans in Africa
It is projected that the number of HIV infections will peak in 2010
(at between 25 and 30 percent of the population), but the number of AIDS
cases will continue to increase for another 5 to 10 years. Almost 1
million South African orphans under 15 will die of AIDS by 2005. 1 out
of every 7 South African children will be an HIV/AIDS orphan by 2005.
HIV prevalence is highest among South African women aged 20 – 30.
Approximately 40-60 percent of all South African tuberculosis patients
are HIV-positive. Life-expectancy in Africa will have plunged to 30 by
the end of this decade. Currently, in Botswana it has dropped from 71 to
39. Between 28 and 45 percent of mineworkers in South Africa are
HIV-positive. This has already led to a 15-percent drop in productivity
at mines. Mines lose between 5 percent and 10 percent of their workers
every year due to AIDS and will need to employ 20 percent more workers
over the next 5 years to maintain normal production. When a worker
develops full-blown AIDS, he/she will be absent from work 50 percent of
the time. When at work, employees suffering with AIDS will function at
50 percent below capacity. 85 percent of Zimbabwe’s soldiers had AIDS
(2000).
– “Country Data - 1997, 1999 & 2001,” By Maphindi Sibiya
Back
CHILD POVERTY FACTS
- According to UNICEF, 30000+ children die each day due to poverty,
or over 9.8 million children a year.
- Less than one per cent of what the world spent every year on
weapons was needed to put every child into school by the year 2000 and
yet it didn't happen.
- The death rate for children under the age of 5 is an unbelievable
210000 week, approx 11 million a year.
- 1 billion children, every 2nd child in the world is currently in
poverty.
- 640 million children go without adequate shelter.
- 400 million children do not have access to safe water.
- 270 million children have no access to health services.
- 1.4 million children die each year from lack of access to safe
drinking water and adequate sanitation.
- 2.2 million children die each year because they are not immunized.
- 15 million children are orphaned yearly due to HIV/AIDS.
**Please Note: All the information above has been
referenced from the following: State of the World's Children, 2005,
UNICEF.
BACK
What are the Millennium Development
Goals?
The eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
– which range from halving extreme poverty to halting the spread of
HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary education, all by the target
date of 2015 – form a blueprint agreed to by all the world’s countries
and all the world’s leading development institutions. They have
galvanized unprecedented efforts to meet the needs of the world’s
poorest.
|
|
|
"We will have time to reach the
Millennium Development Goals – worldwide and in most, or even all,
individual countries – but only if we break with business as usual.
We cannot win overnight. Success will require sustained action
across the entire decade between now and the deadline. It takes time
to train the teachers, nurses and engineers; to build the roads,
schools and hospitals; to grow the small and large businesses able
to create the jobs and income needed. So we must start now. And we
must more than double global development assistance over the next
few years. Nothing less will help to achieve
the Goals."
United Nations Secretary-General
BACK
|
|
|
For further information, please click here to
contact us. |